|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
645
   |
Posted - 2015.01.10 06:54:54 -
[1] - Quote
Remove local or delay it. Afk cloaking fixed.
Forever!
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
749
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 11:04:39 -
[2] - Quote
Nullbears still cry over the lack of complete 100% safetly I see...
They always dock up when you enter local and the only counter to that is cloaky camping.
You cant have counter to both unless you also fix local.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
777
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 10:04:03 -
[3] - Quote
AFK cloaking should stay because it's the only way to attack nullbears in sov space.
"Griefer tears" you speak about are there because the moment you enter local everything docks up, and because of the ratio of hunters:bears is so small we can never cover more than 1% of nullsec at a time because there are so many nullsec systems.
Every hunter will agree that they are perfectly fine with the removal of afk cloaking as long as the local is gone or delayed too.
So really... Your griefer tears are just "I'm not crying it is you who is crying defense mechanism", we don't complain about current mechanics as much as you do but you can't just have it all.
Eve online is not and should not be a theme park where you can block the interaction with other players.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
780
|
Posted - 2015.09.12 19:36:52 -
[4] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Arya Regnar wrote:Eve online is not and should not be a theme park where you can block the interaction with other players. If one side of the "interaction" is not at their PC or even in their house, I question how much "interaction" would actually be blocked... Wow, talk about taking a quote out of context....tell us again how you are such a champion of logic Lucas.  It's not out of context, it's just the only relevant comment requiring a response in the post. Teckos Pech wrote:The problem is Lucas, that the response is always the same, dock up, safe up, etc.
That is what Nikk has been banging on for at least 50 pages. Change PvE so that the PvE guy can not dock up if he thinks he can take the hostile coming into system. And it always will be. Nikk may well have magical ways to improve PvE, but ntohing is going to make a ship already tanking fairly consistent DPS stand a chance against a specifically designed hunter coming to blap him. Whatever happens, the initial response will always be to run away. The trick is to then give them a reason to undock and fight in a capable ship afterwards, which is what sov changes and citadels are aiming to do.
You have in fact taken my quote out of context.
Stop twisting my words you rude person.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
781
|
Posted - 2015.09.13 07:22:14 -
[5] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Incorrect. I'm simply committed to my ideas and you get upset when people don't just buckle when you rant and attack them. If you have an argument, feel free to post it. If you instead want to give your personal remarks or attacks on my posing behaviour, keep them off of the forums.
Commited to your ideas is another word for narrow minded.
You are attacking the rest and then crying when others do the same.
Expect bitchslaps for shitposting.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
884
|
Posted - 2016.01.28 15:55:08 -
[6] - Quote
Page 1: I'm cool if you remove afk cloaking but only if you also remove local.
Page 281: I'm cool if you remove afk cloaking but only if you also remove local.
200+ pages of this and carebears who just want to safely rat in nullsec without any risk.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
|
|
| |
|